Bloomberg Businessweek
1.3 Million People Lost Unemployment Benefits. It Could Get Ugly
By Joshua Green
January 02, 2014
When Congress reconvenes on Jan. 6, one of the first issues it will take up
is whether to renew an emergency federal unemployment program that expired on
Dec. 28, cutting off 1.3 million jobless workers. Enacted in 2008 at the start
of the recession, it provided up to 47 weeks of benefits for those still
looking for work when their state unemployment benefits ran out. Senate Majority
Leader Harry Reid says hefll try to pass a temporary extension, but most
Republicans have balked at the $25 billion-a-year cost. If the program isnft
revived, the impact could be significant—not just for the 1.3 million
people losing a vital lifeline but on the broader economy.
How will these workers fare? One place to look for answers is North Carolina.
Last February, at the behest of the business community, Republican Governor Pat
McCrory signed a bill cutting the amount and duration of state jobless benefits,
even though North Carolinafs unemployment rate ranked among the highest in the
country. The state had exhausted its unemployment trust fund, paid for by
business taxes, and had borrowed $2.5 billion from the federal government to pay
jobless claims. gWefre going to pay down that debt, make the system solvent, and
provide an economic climate that allows businesses, large and small, to put
people back to work,h McCrory said at the time. When the new law took effect on
July 1, the maximum weekly benefit fell from $535 to $350 and its duration fell
to between 12 and 20 weeks (depending on the statefs unemployment rate) from 26
weeks—the standard in most other states.
That was only half the blow. Reducing state benefits violated the terms of
the federal program—which is intended to supplement, not replace, state aid—so
workers in North Carolina were also disqualified from receiving federal
benefits. In essence, the statefs experience over the last six months is a
harbinger of what may be in store for the rest of the country. gThis doesnft
have to be a thought experiment, because you can just look at whatfs happened in
North Carolina,h says Aaron Chatterji, an economist at Duke Universityfs Fuqua
School of Business. gThe 1.3 million people losing their benefits are going to
be in the same position as the 170,000 people here who have lost theirs.h
At first glance, the effect appears to be positive. North Carolinafs
unemployment rate dropped dramatically, from 8.8 percent to 7.4 percent between
July and November. By comparison, the national unemployment rate fell by
0.6 percent over the same period. A closer look, however, suggests that
North Carolinafs unemployment numbers have fallen not because the long-term
jobless have found work but because theyfve quit looking altogether. As a
result, the state no longer counts them as unemployed.
gThe decline in the unemployment rate gives you a very limited view of whatfs
going on in our labor market,h says John Quinterno, founder of South by North
Strategies, an economic research firm in Chapel Hill, N.C. gYear over year, the
number of employed people in North Carolina ticked up by 6,082, while the
unemployed fell by 101,901. That means the labor force contracted by 95,009. So
the improvement has not necessarily been driven by more people going to work and
is actually being driven to a large degree by people leaving the labor force.h
In October the statefs labor force participation rate hit a 37-year low. One
benefit of unemployment insurance is that git has an anchoring effect,h says
Quinterno, gbecause you have to be looking for workh to qualify for
benefits.
Though the job market hasnft fully recovered from the recession, many
Republicans believe extending jobless benefits saps workersf motivation to seek
employment or accept positions they deem less than ideal. gI do support
unemployment benefits for the 26 weeks that theyfre paid for,h Kentucky Senator
Rand Paul said on Fox News on Dec. 8. gBeyond that, you do a disservice to these
workers. When you allow people to be on unemployment insurance for 99 weeks,
youfre causing them to become part of this perpetual unemployed group.h
Economic research has shown that some job seekers do become less selective
about the jobs theyfre willing to take once their unemployment insurance
expires—the so-called gemployment effect.h Therefs evidence this may be
occurring in North Carolina. A Dec. 20 note from JPMorgan Chasefs (JPM) chief U.S. economist, Michael Feroli, pointed
out that the statefs employment growth has outpaced national growth since July.
Yet he also noted that labor force participation has fallen much faster than it
has nationally. gIn this case,h he concluded, git would appear both channels are
operative but the participation effect may be more important.h
Itfs hard to draw firm conclusions from limited data. But if the expiration
of jobless benefits is prompting large numbers of North Carolinians to give up
looking for work, it would augur poorly for the statefs economy and the
countryfs, too. Working-age Americans who canft find gainful employment
represent lost economic value and unmet U.S. growth potential. While some may
settle for part-time work, others will try to qualify for disability. Long
stretches of unemployment reduce the likelihood of finding a job, as skills and
connections atrophy.
As people cycle in and out of the unemployment system this year, an
additional 3.6 million workers will lose access to benefits if federal insurance
isnft restored, according to a December report by the White House Council of
Economic Advisers. Thatfs a lot of misery and squandered economic potential.
Itfs also why gthe Tar Heel test tube,h as Feroli has dubbed it, is worth paying
attention to. Says Chatterji, gThe statistics are so dramatic.h